Menu Close

Dublin Review

Published 1836-1968). Monthly, 6s. Published in London, primarily for English (not Irish) readers. Owned by Nicholas Wiseman and Daniel O’Connell, the Dublin was ‘part of the Catholic revival of the first quarter of the nineteenth century’ taking ‘a moderate editorial line.’ A New Series began in 1863, with more history and extended book reviews. (See DNCJ, where all quotations appear, for further information and references to additional sources; online edition ProQuest British Periodicals.)

Michael Joseph.“Musical History, Biography, and Criticism: Being a General Survey of Music, from the Earliest Period to the Present Time.” Dublin Review, 1, no. 1: (May 1836): 100–131.
        Author is George Hogarth; book published 1835. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Wiseman, Nicholas (Cardinal).“Materials for the Ecclesiastical History of Germany in the Nineteenth Century.” Dublin Review, 2, no. 3: (December 1836): 168–86.
        Examines this work dedicated to the history of Catholics and Protestants in Germany in the 19th century by mainly focusing on the content of the work. Original title is Beitrage zur Kirchengeschichte des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts in Deutschland. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Groves, Edward C.“The Case of Maynooth College Considered, with a History of the First Establishment of That Seminary; an Account of the System of Education Pursued in It; and a Review of the Effect It Has Had on the Character of the Roman Catholic Clergy of Ireland.” Dublin Review, 2, no. 3: (December 1836): 129–68.
        Examines the content and merit of several works dedicated to the history of Maynooth College in Ireland. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Smith, James.“A History of England from the Invasion of the Romans (Vol 1, 4th Ed).” Dublin Review, 3, no. 5: (July 1837): 273–74.
        Regard’s John Lingard’s book as valuable, accurate, and impartial and states that the additions made to the fourth edition make this wonderful historical work even more useful and important as the ‘only history of England.’ Publisher is Baldwin and Craddock. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
O’Connell, John.“History of Ireland.” Dublin Review, 3, no. 5: (July 1837): 15–43.
        A general review of the works of several scholars, including excerpts as well as descriptions of content. Discusses the interaction between the British and the Irish as well as the trade, manufacturing, agriculture, and people of Ireland. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Anstey, Thomas Chisholm.“Geschichte Der Vorlaufer Der Reformation. History of the Forerunners of the Reformation.” Dublin Review, 3, no. 6: (October 1837): 325–59.
        This review uses several different works about the Reformation to try to discredit the connection between the Protestants, the Waldenses, and SS. Paul and James. Uses content, excerpts and the Catholic view of the situation to attempt to discredit these affiliations. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Anstey, Thomas Chisholm.“The French Revolution, A History, in Three Volumes.” Dublin Review, 5, no. 10: (October 1838): 349–76.
        Discusses the work of Thomas Carlyle on the French Revolution and provides excerpts. Offers some minor criticisms, but overall notes that Carlyle has shed light on the causes and sequence of events of the Revolution. Also spends sometime discussing Carlyle’s character and methods. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Lingard, John.“Dodd’s Church History of England, from the Commencement of the Sixteenth Century to the Revolution in 1688, with Notes, Additions, and a Continuation (Vol 1, New Edition).” Dublin Review, 6, no. 12: (May 1839): 395–415.
        Examines the Rev. M. A. Tierney’s new edition of Charles Dodd’s book (dedicated to the Church from the birth of Jesus to the death of Henry VIII) by looking at the author himself (his life and writing style), the content of the work, and the merit of the additions made by Tierney. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Urlichs, Karl Ludwig.“History of Rome.” Dublin Review, 7, no. 13: (August 1839): 69–98.
        Examines Thomas Arnold’s book, with little attention to the other two books listed for review. Focuses on the content of Arnold’s history, comparing it to the work of other scholars who focused on the same subject. States that Arnold’s work is sincere and candid and one of the best works on the subject. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.” Dublin Review, 8, no. 15: (February 1840): 189–220.
        Examines Edward Gibbon’s book , partly by looking at the merits of its content but also by providing details of Gibbon’s life and the background to his history-writing. Book published 1838. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
McMahon, Patrick.“A History of England, from the First Invasion by the Romans.” Dublin Review, 12, no. 24: (May 1842): 295–354.
        This review of two editions of John Lingard’s work (first published in 8 vols 1819-30; 4th edition 13 vols 1837-9) discusses the merit and content of the book and compares it favourably with other works, notably that of Hume. States that this is the best work on the subject; calm, good tempered, thoughtful, and accurate. Also defends book against criticism of earlier reviewers. Book published 1819-1830. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Jeffrey, Francis.“On the Use and Study of History.” Dublin Review, 13, no. 25: (August 1842): 252–59.
        States that this series of 6 lectures by W. Torrens McCullagh is patriotic, sympathetic, noble and interesting. Publisher is Machen, of Dublin.
Quin, Michael Joseph.“History of the Reign of Ferdinand and Isabella, the Catholic, of Spain.” Dublin Review, 13, no. 26: (November 1842): 308–46.
        Offers a detailed discussion of the content of the book by William H. Prescott, with many excerpts. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Kelly, Matthew.“A Compendious Ecclesiastical History, from the Earliest Period to the Present Time.” Dublin Review, 14, no. 27: (February 1843): 178–223.
        Examines the theories and content of this book by the Rev. William Palmer; states that the author is not the best authority on Irish ecclesiastical affairs and can often be biased and lack impartiality. Book published 1840. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Jeffrey, Francis.“The Ecclesiastical and Political History of the Popes of Rome, during the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries.” Dublin Review, 14, no. 28: (May 1843): 321–79.
        Examines the theories and content of Leopold Ranke’s book, questions the author’s validity as a historian; states that many irrelevant topics are overreached. Translator is Sarah Austin. Book published 1841. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Turnbull, William Barclay David Donald.“History of St. Andrews, Episcopal, Monastic, Academic, and Civil; Comprising the Principal Part of the Ecclesiastical History of Scotland from the Earliest Age to the Present Time.” Dublin Review, 15, no. 30: (December 1843): 454–69.
        States that although this book by C. J. Lyons is commendable for its attempt at presenting a history of the author’s native country , it was poorly planned and awkwardly translated; moreover it contains ‘monstrosities on every page.’ {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“Justorum Semita; or the Path of the Just. A History of the Saints and Holidays of the Present English Kalendar.” Dublin Review, 15, no. 30: (December 1843): 558.
        States that this work is truly Catholic and delightful and that it is written with elegance and spirit.
Wiseman, Nicholas (Cardinal).“Abbe M’Geoghegan’s History of Ireland (New Edition).” Dublin Review, 16, no. 31: (March 1844): 277.
        States that this work contains useful historical knowledge, has beautiful physical characteristics, and is the most valuable book about Irish history to date. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Sullivan, Maurice John.“History of the Conquest of Mexico.” Dublin Review, 16, no. 31: (March 1844): 45–65.
        Offers content of W. H. Prescott’s book, as well as excerpt; states that it is eloquent, utilizes excellent primary sources, and has much literary and moral value. Book published 1843. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Flanagan, Thomas.“The History and Antiquities of the Anglo-Saxon Church.” Dublin Review, 18, no. 35: (March 1845): 128–74.
        Examines John Lingard’s book from the perspective of earlier works on the same subject; then offers a discussion in depth of the content, with numerous excerpts. Publisher is C. Dolman, 1844. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“The History of the Church of England in the Colonies and Foreign Dependencies of the British Empire.” Dublin Review, 18, no. 36: (June 1845): 583–84.
        States that although this book by the Rev. J. S. M. Anderson focuses more on the colonization aspect than the religious, it is diligently researched and its tone is fair and conciliatory. Publisher is Rivingtons. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Murphy, Dominick.“The History of Sweden, Translated from the Original of ANDERS FRYXELL.” Dublin Review, 19, no. 37: (September 1845): 229–65.
        States that this book by Anders Fryxell is interesting and well-written and offers content and excerpts. Book published 1844. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“The Military History of the Irish Nation, Comprising a Memoir of the Irish, Brigade, in the Service of France.” Dublin Review, 19, no. 38: (September 1845): [281]-311.
        Examines the content of Matthew O’Connor’s interesting and well-written work. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Jeffrey, Francis.“The History of the Great Reformation of the Sixteenth Century, in Germany, Switzerland, &c.” Dublin Review, 20, no. 39: (March 1846): 31–83.
        Discusses the history behind the construction of book by J. H. Merle d’Aubigne as well as summarizing the content. Book published 1841. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“Water-Wheels, Especially Turbines or Whirl-Wheels; Their History, Construction, and Theory, Illustrated for the Use of Mechanics.” Dublin Review, 20, no. 39: (March 1846): 268.
        States that Sir Robert Kane’s edition, which is a component of a larger work by Moritz Ruhlmann, is interesting and useful. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“An Outline of Ecclesiastical and Civil History, Exhibiting in Opposite Pages and under Corresponding Dates, the Principal Events Which Have Occurred since the Death of Christ.” Dublin Review, 20, no. 40: (June 1846): 532.
        Brief review states that this book by the Rev. Edmund Winstanley is accurate and will prove useful in Catholic Colleges. Publisher is T. Jones. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Wiseman, Nicholas (Cardinal).“D’Aubigne’s History of the Great Reformation in Germany and Switzerland, Reviewed and Refuted; or the Reformation in Germany Examined in Its Instruments, Causes, Manner, and Its Influences on Religion, Government, Literature, and General Civilization.” Dublin Review, 21, no. 41: (September 1846): 266.
        States that this new edtion by the Rev. M. J. Spaldins , much like its predecessors, is recommended especially for the second part of the book. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Wiseman, Nicholas (Cardinal).“Tales of the Century, or Sketches of the Romance of History, between the Years 1746 and 1846.” Dublin Review, 21, no. 42: (January 1847): 509–14.
        Authors are given as John Sobieski and Charles Edward Stuart. Summarizes content and provides excerpts. Publisher is Marshall, of Edinburgh. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Crolly, George.“A Catholic History of England.” Dublin Review, 22, no. 43: (March 1847): 92–124.
        States that this book by William Bernard McCabe simply utilizes the content of other works and does not bring anything new to the study of this topic. Publisher is Newby. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Harris, Elizabeth Furlong Shipton.“History of the House of Austria (Vol 1).” Dublin Review, 22, no. 43: (March 1847): 269.
        States that William Coxe’s book, dedicated to Luther and the Reformation , is beyond review and need only be congratulated, as the author’s past work speaks for itself. Attribution Wellesley Index.
“The National Music of Ireland, Containing the History of the Irish Bards, the National Melodies, the Harp, and Other Musical Instruments of Erin.” Dublin Review, 22, no. 43: (March 1847): 266–67.
        States that this book by Michael Conran is interesting, complete, and well supported with evidence; it successfully connects Irish music with that of other countries. Publisher is Duffy, 1846.
“A Manual of British and Irish History.” Dublin Review, 22, no. 44: (June 1847): 522–23.
        Simply discusses the attributes of the book by the Rev. Thomas Flanagan, also remarking that the book is of good physical quality, with good wood engravings, and useful tables and maps. Publisher is Jones.
Wiseman, Nicholas (Cardinal).“Sketches of the History of Christian Art.” Dublin Review, 22, no. 44: (June 1847): 486–515.
        Discusses the previous works on the subject and the content of this book by Lord Lindsay; states that this is the most complete on the subject and will prove useful to those travelling to Italy to visit galleries, and will awaken thought in the reader. Publisher is John Murray. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Bridges, Matthew.“A Scholastical History of the Canon of Holy Scripture, or the Certain and Indubitate Books Thereof, as They Are Received in the Church of England.” Dublin Review, 23, no. 45: (September 1847): 104–23.
        Looks at the content of this book by John Cosin, offering lengthy excerpts. Publisher is Talboys, of Oxford, 1843-1845. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
O’Hagan, John.“The Constitutional History of the University of Dublin, with Some Account of Its Present Condition and Suggestions for Improvement.” Dublin Review, 23, no. 45: (September 1847): 228–51.
        Examines the content of this book, by Denis Cauldfield Heron, as well as earlier works dedicated to this subject. Publisher is McGlashan, of Dublin. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“The History of the Saracens; Comprising the Lives of Mohammed and His Successors, to the Death of Abdalmelik, the Eleventh Caliph, with an Account of Their Most Remarkable Battles, Sieges, Revolts, &c.; Collected from Authentic Sources, Especially Arabic MSS.” Dublin Review, 23, no. 45: (September 1847): 271.
        States that the excellence of Simon Ockley’s book is beyond recommendation and congratulates the work also on being cheap. Publisher is Henry G. Bohn.
Russell, Charles William.“A Manual of British and Irish History; Illustrated with Maps, Engravings, and Statistical, Chronological, and Genealogical Tables.” Dublin Review, 23, no. 46: (December 1847): 364–73.
        Another review of Rev. Thomas Flanagan’s work states that this is the most difficult and valuable work on the subject, and that its style is clear, simple, natural, and energetic; the narrative is graceful and vigorous. Publisher is Jones. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Kenealy, Edward Vaughan Hyde.“History of the Conquest of Peru, with a Preliminary View of the Civilization of the Incas.” Dublin Review, 23, no. 46: (December 1847): 322–40.
        States that although William Prescott seems to be an author who is above review, the reviewer is nevertheless going to be hard on him. States that there is nothing new in this work and it has a questionable style (contains Americanism). Presents the material in the work with many excerpts. Publisher is Bentley. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
MacCabe, William Bernard.“The History of the Penal Laws Enacted against Roman Catholics.” Dublin Review, 23, no. 46: (December 1847): 522–24.
        This brief review states that R. R. Madden’s history is valuable, honest, and well-researched and it is hoped that this work can be further reviewed in more depth later. Publisher is Richardson & Son. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
McMahon, Patrick.“Byways of History, from the Twelfth to the Sixteenth Century.” Dublin Review, 24, no. 47: (March 1848): 109–14.
        Author is Mrs R. Sinnett; subject-matter is primarily Luther. Publisher is Longman, 1847. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Jeffrey, Francis.“A History of the Holy Eastern Church.-The Patriarchate of Alexandria.” Dublin Review, 24, no. 48: (June 1848): 487–517.
        States that this history, by the Rev John Mason Neale, is interesting, devoted, and impartial but the review brings Neale’s capacity as an historian into question, noting his lack of good sources and his having abandoned an initial plan to provide an introduction. Publisher is Masters, 1847. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“History of the Bank of England; Its Times and Traditions (3rd Ed).” Dublin Review, 24, no. 48: (June 1848): 526–27.
        States that John Francis’s book, which focuses on how banking arose and how the national bank was created and developed, is valuable; the author is well equipped for the undertaking as he describes events clearly and portrays characters boldly and truly. Publisher is Willoughby and Co. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“Epitome of Alison’s History of Europe, from the French Revolution to the Restoration of the Bourbons.” Dublin Review, 26, no. 52: (June 1849): 530–31.
        States that this useful and valuable work contains good indexes, chronological tables, and summaries of events; Archibald Alison’s is not only a good history but also a convenient reference work. Publisher is Blackwood .
Russell, Charles William.“The History of England, from the Accession of James II (Vols 1 & 2).” Dublin Review, 26, no. 52: (June 1849): 390–441.
        In an article that discusses the author as well as the subject-matter of the book, the reviewer observes that although Macaulay’s book is frequently inaccurate and often offers too much detail, it is well-researched and offers clear accounts of the events. Publisher is Longman. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“A Catholic History of England.” Dublin Review, 27, no. 53: (September 1849): 128–46.
        States that this book, by William Berhard MacCabe, is well-researched and impartial; examines the content of the work with excerpts. Publisher is Newby. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“The History of England, for the Use of Schools and Young Persons (6th Ed).” Dublin Review, 27, no. 53: (September 1849): 258.
        This brief review states that book by W. F. Mylius is carefully compiled, utilizes excellent sources, and is just and solid in its views. Publisher is Richardson and Son.
MacCabe, William Bernard.“The History of St. Cuthbert; or, an Account of His Life, Decease, and Miracles; of the Wanderings with His Body at Intervals during 124 Years; of the State of His Body from His Decease until A. D. 1542; and of the Various Monuments Erected to His Memory.” Dublin Review, 27, no. 54: (December 1849): 512–28.
        Examines the content of this book by the Rev. C. Eyre; states that it is invaluable, thoroughly researched, and interesting. Publisher is James Burns. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“The History of Peter the Cruel, King of Castile and Leon.” Dublin Review, 28, no. 55: (March 1850): 1–25.
        Offers an in-depth discussion of the content of the book by Prosper Merimee, with excerpts; claims that this work is extensively researched, utilizing original documents but is flimsy and arbitrary in places. Publisher is Bentley, 1849. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
MacCabe, William Bernard.“The History of the Papal States, from Their Origin to the Present Day.” Dublin Review, 28, no. 55: (March 1850): 123–41.
        Examines the Rev. John Miley’s book by discussing its arrangement and content, and offering excerpts; states that this work is valuable and original. Publisher is T.C. Newby. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Jeffrey, Francis.“History of the Inquisition, from Its Establishment to the Present Time, with an Account of Its Procedure and Narratives of Its Victims.” Dublin Review, 28, no. 56: (June 1850): 421–69.
        Discusses the Inquisition from ancient times until the present, making little attempt to review anything. Publisher is Ward & Co. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Flanagan, Thomas.“A History of the Romans under the Empire (Vols 1 & 2).” Dublin Review, 30, no. 60: (June 1851): 436–53.
        Examines the content of Charles Merivale’s work, stating that the title is misleading as the book is more of a history of the life and times of Julius Caesar than a history of Rome from the first Triumvirate to the reign of Constantine as outlined by the author. Publisher is Longman, 1850. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“A Short Catechism of English History, Ecclesiastical and Civil.” Dublin Review, 31, no. 61: (September 1851): 283.
        Very brief review states that this book by the Rev. T. A. Flanagan is clear, truthful, and presented with Catholic views. Publisher is Richardson and Son. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“The History of the Church of Rome, to the End of the Episcopate of Damascus, A.D. 384.” Dublin Review, 31, no. 62: (December 1851): 437–75.
        Examines and picks apart Edward John Shepherd’s ideas and content by offering many excerpts and examples. Claims that overall this work is anti-Roman, inaccurate, and skeptical. Publisher is Longman. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“The History of Mary, Queen of Scots.” Dublin Review, 32, no. 63: (March 1852): 134–84.
        Examines past biographies on Mary and does much comparing this work of F. A. Mignet to those earlier works; the book does not add much to the topic and that Mignet can be unjust and lack impartiality. Publisher is Bentley, 1851. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“A Manual of Ecclesiastical History from the First to the Twelfth Century Inclusive.” Dublin Review, 32, no. 64: (June 1852): 512–29.
        Reviewer compares the author of the work, the Rev. E. S. Foulkes, to others working on a similar subject (specifically Shepherd) and focuses more on testing the author’s principles than on the book under review. States that this work, which treats Church History like science, is partial and one sided. Publisher is Parker, 1851. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Robertson, James Burton.“Der Cardinal Ximenes Und Die Kirchliche Zustande Spaniens Am Ende Des 15, Und Anfange Des 16 Jahrhunderts. Insbesondere Ein Beytrag Zur Geschichte Und Wurdigung Der Inquisition. [Cardinal Ximenes and the Ecclesiastical State of Spain at the Close of the Fifteenth and the Beginning of the Sixteenth Century; Containing Special Reference to the History of the Inquisition.].” Dublin Review, 33, no. 65: (September 1852): 140–83.
        Examines the content of this book by Dr Hefele, providing excerpts. States that it is more historical than biographical and is well-researched, clear, and utilizes an elegant style. Published in Tubingen, 1844. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“History of the Council of Trent.” Dublin Review, 33, no. 65: (September 1852): 184–219.
        Examines various works that have been written on this topic and compares the works at hand (by Buckley, Rutjes, Brischar, Wessenberg, Mendham) to earlier books by Sarpi, Pallavinicini, and others. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Price, Edward.“A History and Description of Westminster Abbey.” Dublin Review, 35, no. 70: (December 1853): 524.
        Briefly discusses the content of the book and states that it is cheap and useful. Publisher is Richardson and Son. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“Ancient History.” Dublin Review, 35, no. 70: (December 1853): 531–32.
        States that this book, by Peter Fredet, fulfills all that a book of this nature should; it is a skilfully connected narrative, carefully arranged, and truthful and accurate. Publisher is Dolman.
“A Catholic History of England (Vol 3).” Dublin Review, 36, no. 71: (March 1854): 259–61.
        Preliminary announcement of this volume of William Bernhard McCabe’s work. Recommended to Catholic students of English history as it has a judicious method and provides an original history. Publisher is Newby.
Russell, Charles William.“History of Oliver Cromwell and the English Commonwealth, from the Execution of Charles the First to the Death of Cromwell.” Dublin Review, 36, no. 72: (June 1854): 494–520.
        Reviewer expressed distaste for L. Guizot’s views overall and states that this work does not contain anything new; offers a evaluation of the content; compares Guizot to past historians who have written on the same subject. Publisher is Bentley. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Abraham, George Whitely.“A Catholic History of England (Vol 3).” Dublin Review, 37, no. 74: (December 1854): [273]-287.
        Full review examines the content of third volume of this book by William Berhard MacCabe and the historical influences on the author. Publisher is Newby. Attribution Wellesley Index.
“History of French Literature in the Eighteenth Century.” Dublin Review, 37, no. 74: (December 1854): 524–25.
        Author is Alexander Vinet; translator is James Bryce. Claims that any value this work may have had is lost in its translation. Publisher is Clark of Edinburgh.
“A History of India under the Two First Sovereigns of the House of Taimur, Baber and Humayun.” Dublin Review, 38, no. 75: (March 1855): 256–58.
        Briefly examines the content of the book by William Erskine; claims that it is put together with care, well-researched, and offers an excellent and judicious order. Publisher is Longman, 1854.
“Abridgment of the History of England.” Dublin Review, 38, no. 75: (March 1855): 254.
        Lingard’s history, continued by James Burke. States that the book is judicious and agreeable and that Burke’s continuation, though brief, is elegant and helps a remarkable narrative to remain one of the most valuable on the topic. Publisher is Dolman.
“An Abridged History of England (7th Ed).” Dublin Review, 38, no. 75: (March 1855): 256.
        States that the merits of this book, by W. Fl. Mylius, are well known; reviewer is happy to see a seventh edition. Publisher is Derby: Richardson and Son, of Dublin.
Walford, Edward.“Ince’s Outlines of English History.” Dublin Review, 38, no. 75: (March 1855): 262.
        Claims that Henry Ince’s book is fair and impartial and is the best book for youths on the topic, because it does not contain any of the usual anti-Catholic remarks. Publisher is J. Gilbert. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Gainsford, Robert John.“History of the United States of America, from the Discovery of the American Continent.” Dublin Review, 38, no. 76: (June 1855): [273]-299.
        Offers a discussion of the content of George Bancroft’s history, focusing specifically upon questions of religious tolerance; states that this work is concise, accurate, and interesting. Publisher is Routledge and Co., 1851. Attribution Wellesley Index.
Jeffrey, Francis.“Lingard’s History of England: St. Thomas of Canterbury (Vols 1-3).” Dublin Review, 38, no. 76: (June 1855): 355–413.
        Focuses mainly on the content of the book, also noting what other historians have said about St. Thomas. Publisher is Dolman. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Finlason, William Francis.“History of France.” Dublin Review, 39, no. 78: (December 1855): 505–6.
        States that this ‘semi-infidel’ work by E. De Bonnechose should never have been approved by the Royal Council of Public Instruction; then offers an example of some of the content to support the argument. Publisher is Routledge. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Finlason, William Francis.“History of the Catholic Missions among the Indian Tribes of the United States, 1529-1854.” Dublin Review, 39, no. 78: (December 1855): 524.
        Claims that this book by John Shea is interesting and well-researched. Publisher is Dunigan, of New York.
Finlason, William Francis.“The Constitutional History of England.” Dublin Review, 39, no. 78: (December 1855): 503.
        Very critical of Henry Hallam’s ritualistic bias and “almost morbid impatience of all authority”. Publisher is John Murray.
“The Crimea: Its Ancient and Modern History.” Dublin Review, 39, no. 78: (December 1855): 497.
        States that this book by the Rev Thomas Milner is not complete (and the author realizes this) and it is likely that a more vivid picture of this topic will likely be be written when more is known . Meanwhile, however, this work leaves little to be desired. Publisher is Longman.
Finlason, William Francis.“The History of England (Vol 3. 5th Ed).” Dublin Review, 39, no. 78: (December 1855): 328–84.
        Offers a detailed discussion of the content of Lingard’s book. Publisher is Dolman, 1849. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Finlason, William Francis.“Dr. Lingard’s History of England (Vols 6 & 7).” Dublin Review, 41, no. 81: (March 1856): 1–27.
        Discusses in detail the content of these volumes dedicated to the Reformation. Publisher is Dolman. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Finlason, William Francis.“Lingard’s History of England (Vol 4 & 5, 6th Ed).” Dublin Review, 40, no. 79: (March 1856): 1–66.
        Offers a detailed discussion of the content . Publisher is Dolman. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“The History of England from the Accession of James the Second (Vols3 & 4).” Dublin Review, 40, no. 79: (March 1856): 156–200.
        Examines the claims and content of this work and states that, although Macaulay displays reckless partisanship, his work is brilliant, striking, and eloquent and that the author is a calm and philosophical historian. Publisher is Longman, 1855. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“History of Latin Christianity, Including That of the Popes to the Pontificate of Nicholas V.” Dublin Review, 40, no. 80: (June 1856): [5]-23.
        Examines the content and viewpoints of this book by Henry Hart Milman; states that it is not beyond the level of an essay as it focuses on one view and the events, characters, and records are all in support of that view. Also observes that although Milman is a calm and philosophical writer he is passionless and partisan. Publisher is John Murray, 1855.
Crolly, George.“History of the Reign of Philip the Second, King of Spain (Vols 1 & 2).” Dublin Review, 40, no. 80: (June 1856): 454–81.
        Discusses the content of W. H. Prescott’s book; states that although the author’s style has improved in this work he does not have the materials, industry or impartiality to write a narrative on this topic and that he is ignorant and inaccurate in his views. Publisher is Richard Bentley, 1855. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Abraham, George Whitely.“The Constitutional History of England, from the Accession of Henry VII. to the Death of George II.” Dublin Review, 40, no. 80: (June 1856): 392–417.
        States that although Henry Hallam’s work is honest and candid, it contains useless and hurtful content, unsound arguments, bold assertions, and prejudiced writing. The reviewer looks at some of Hallam’s claims and compares his work to that of Macaulay. Publisher is John Murray, 1855. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“The Pictorial Bible and Church History Stories.” Dublin Review, 40, no. 80: (June 1856): 543–45.
        Reviews the first two of a projected 7-part series by Henry Formby (published Burns & Lambert). Praises the work for careful and complete execution and good illustrations, unusual in a Catholic history.
Abraham, George Whitely.“History of Richard Cromwell and the Restoration of Charles II.” Dublin Review, 41, no. 81: (September 1856): 86–117.
        Discusses the content of M. Guizot’s work in detail and states that it is worthy of praise from Englishmen and students. Publisher is Richard Bentley. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“The History of Sedgley Park School, Staffordshire.” Dublin Review, 41, no. 81: (September 1856): 250.
        States that F. C. Husenbeth preserves important and interesting facts. Publisher is Richardson and Son.
Finlason, William Francis.“Dr. Lingard’s History of England (Vols 7-8).” Dublin Review, 41, no. 82: (December 1856): 383–411.
        Discusses in detail the content of these volumes dedicated to the Great Rebellion of the 17th century. Publisher is Dolman. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Finlason, William Francis.“History of England; from the Fall of Wolsey to the Death of Elizabeth (Vols 1 & 2).” Dublin Review, 41, no. 82: (December 1856): 307–44.
        Examines the content and claims of Froude’s history, comparing it to the work of Lingard; states that it is often eloquent but can also be inconsistent. Publisher is J.W. Parker and Son. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“The History and Antiquities of St. David’s.” Dublin Review, 41, no. 82: (December 1856): 529–30.
        States that although this book by W. B. Jones and E. H. Freeman [sic] offers nothing new, it is artistically excellent, and contains useful historical and statistical information. Publisher is Parker. The authors are William Basil Jones and Edward Augustus Freeman.
Russell, Charles William.“A Popular Ancient History.” Dublin Review, 42, no. 83: (March 1857): 268.
        This very brief review states that Matthew Bridges’ book is excellent, valuable, using pleasant writing and style, and exercising good judgement. Publisher is Burns and Lambert, 1856. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“A School History of the United States, from the Earliest Period to the Present Time.” Dublin Review, 42, no. 83: (March 1857): 254.
        States that this school history by John G. Shea is clear for a compendium and is just to the Catholics and not entirely unfair to the English. Publisher is Dunigan of New York.
Finlason, William Francis.“Dr. Lingard’s History of England (Vols 9 & 10, 6th Ed.” Dublin Review, 42, no. 83: (March 1857): 26–76.
        Discusses the content of these volumes, which focus on the revolution in the seventeenth century. Publisher is Dolman.
Russell, Charles William.“History of the Christian Church, from the Election of Pope Gregory the Great, to the Concordat of Worms.” Dublin Review, 42, no. 83: (March 1857): 266–68.
        Briefly examines the content and claims that James Craigie Robertson’s book is careful and minute in its research and improves upon its predecessors’ contributions, being a great advancement in church history. However the work is criticized for bias. Publisher is John Murray. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“Tales and Legends from History.” Dublin Review, 42/3, no. 83: (March 1857): 252–53.
        States that this (anonymous) work, focused mainly on tales and legends connected to the Catholic Church, is interesting and has a simple style that is to be praised; furthermore the content offers spiritual meaning. Publisher is Burns and Lambert.
“The History and Conquests of the Saracens.” Dublin Review, 42, no. 83: (March 1857): 259.
        States that E. A. Freeman’s work is useful in shedding light on an under-studied topic but that the author has some objectionable principles and is too favourable toward Mohammed. Publisher is Parker, 1856.
“Collections Illustrating the History of the Catholic Religion in the Counties of Cornwall, Devon, Dorset, Somerset, Wilts, and Gloucester.” Dublin Review, 42, no. 84: (June 1857): 527–28.
        Claims that this work needs no recommendation as it upholds the Rev George Oliver’s good reputation; offers a brief discussion of the subject matter and states that it is well-researched. Publisher is Dolman.
Russell, Charles William.“The History of Normandy and of England (Vol 2).” Dublin Review, 42, no. 84: (June 1857): 528.
        Claims that this work is full of Sir Francis Palgrave’s usual characteristics, being well-researched, quaint, eccentric, and beautiful. Publisher is Parker and Son. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Jeffrey, Francis.“The Spanish Conquest in America, and Its Relations to the History of Slavery and the Government of Colonies.” Dublin Review, 42, no. 84: (June 1857): 294–317.
        Offers a detailed discussion of the content with lengthy excerpts and claims that Arthur Helps’s book, which is designed to aid those in search of answers to questions about slavery, is impartial, uses well-translated sources, and is truthful. However the reviewer notes that the style is not in historical order and therefore cannot be compared to other’s works on the topic. Publisher is Parker and Son. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“A Critical History of the Language and Literature of Ancient Greece (Vol 5).” Dublin Review, 43, no. 85: (September 1857): 258–59.
        Briefly discusses the content of this and previous volumes of William Mure’s work and states that it is interesting, complete, and agreeable. Publisher is Longman.
“A History of the Church in England, from the Earliest Period to the Reestablishment of the Hierarchy in 1850.” Dublin Review, 43, no. 85: (September 1857): 262–65.
        The reviewer criticizes the Rev Canon Flanagan for writing more of an outline than a history, by summarizing topics rather than discussing them at length, but still finds the work very valuable as a source for religious history. Publisher is Dolman.
Russell, Charles William.“Five Years in Damascus, Including an Account of the History, Topography, and Antiquities of That City. With Travels and Researches in Palmyra, Lebanon, and the Hauran.” Dublin Review, 43, no. 85: (September 1857): 266–67.
        States that this work is interesting and that the Rev J. L. Porter is well informed about his topics. Publisher is John Murray, 1855. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Finlason, William Francis.“History of England: From the Peace of Utrecht to the Peace of Versailles (1713-1783).” Dublin Review, 43, no. 85: (September 1857): 1–50.
        Review in depth of various works on English history (Mahon, Macaulay, Creasy, etc). {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“The History of the Romans under the Empire (Vols 4 & 5).” Dublin Review, 43, no. 85: (September 1857): 260–61.
        Discusses the content of Charles Merivale’s book, and states that it is excellent, interesting, and offers a lively picture of important times. Publisher is Longman, 1856.
“The History, Architecture, and Antiquities of the Cathedral Church of St. Canice, Kilkenny.” Dublin Review, 43, no. 86: (December 1857): 526.
        States that this work is valuable, well-researched, and does not overlook any relevant topic. Adds that it is an excellent addition to local Irish history. Authors are the Rev James Graves and John Augustus Pin. Publisher is Hodges, Smith and Co. of Dublin.
“History of the Life and Times of Edward Burke.” Dublin Review, 44, no. 87: (March 1858): 260–61.
        States that Thomas Macknight’s book brings worthy attention to Burke’s memory, but criticizes the style as showy and long winded.
Jeffrey, Francis.“The History and Life of the Rev. Dr. John Tauler, of Strasbourg, with Twenty-Five of His Sermons.” Dublin Review, 44, no. 87: (March 1858): 31–99.
        Under the general title ‘The German Mystics of the Fourteenth Century’, the reviewer examines the content of various books dedicated to Catholicism and the Reformation in Germany, concentrating on Tauler’s work. Author attribution Wellesley Index.
“History of the Romans under the Empire, Vol 6.” Dublin Review, 44, no. 88: (June 1858): 526–28.
        States that Charles Merivale’s work overrates the value and influence of heathen morality and contains theories that are unwarranted and unfounded which the reviewer hope the author will reconsider. However, states that this work is an interesting, useful, and well-told story. Publisher is Longman, 1858.
Finlason, William Francis.“The History of England from the Fall of Wolsey to the Death of Elizabeth (Vols 3 & 4).” Dublin Review, 44, no. 88: (June 1858): 445–85.
        Discusses the content of the work in depth, but regards several claims or sources as bringing Froude’s merit as a historian into question. Publisher is Parker and Son. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“The History of Herodotus.” Dublin Review, 45, no. 89: (September 1858): 259–63.
        Examines the content of volumes 1 and 2 of G. Rawlinson’s translation and states that it is fluent and readable; the work itself is clear and truthful. Promises a complete review when all volumes have been published. Publisher is John Murray.
Crolly, George.“The History of the So-Called Jansenist Church of Holland, with a Sketch of Its Earlier Annals.” Dublin Review, 45, no. 90: (December 1858): 428–84.
        Discusses the content of the Rev. J. M. Neale’s book in great detail and states that this work is glorious and recommended. Publisher is Parker. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“History of Frederick II. of Prussia, Called Frederick the Great.” Dublin Review, 46, no. 91: (March 1859): 264–65.
        Brief notice of volumes 1 and 2, promising extensive review in following issue. Publisher is Chapman and Hall. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“The History and Antiquities of the Anglo-Saxon Church.” Dublin Review, 46, no. 91: (March 1859): 263.
        States that this reprint of Lingard’s older book is of good physical quality and is affordable and commendable. Publisher is the Catholic Publishing Company, 1858.
Russell, Charles William.“The History of Herodotus (Vol 4).” Dublin Review, 46, no. 91: (March 1859): 259–60.
        Examines the content of this volume of G. Rawlinson’s translation; states that the maps, illustrations and notes are very useful. Publisher is John Murray, 1858. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Jeffrey, Francis.“A History of the City of Dublin (Vols 1-3).” Dublin Review, 47, no. 93: (September 1859): 1–33.
        Discusses the content of J. T. Gilbert’s book in detail. Publisher is McGlashon and Gill of Dublin, 1854. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“History of Frederick II of Prussia, Called Frederick the Great (Vols 1 & 2).” Dublin Review, 47, no. 93: (September 1859): 132–68.
        Lengthy, detailed, and scathing examination of first two volumes of Thomas Carlyle’s book, with many excerpts. Publisher is Chapman and Hall, 1858. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“The Life and Contemporaneous Church History of Antonio De Dominis.” Dublin Review, 47, no. 93: (September 1859): 97–110.
        States that Henry Newland’s book was a disappointment; it missed sources which were newly available and offers nothing innovative on the subject. Publisher is Parker and Son, 1858.
Purcell, Edmund Sheridan.“A History of the Italian Republics, Being a View of the Origin, Progress, and Fall of Italian Freedom.” Dublin Review, 48, no. 95: (May 1860): 150–89.
        Discusses various works on Roman history (Sismondi, Maguire, Gretton). {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Donnelly, Thomas.“An Introduction to the History of Jurisprudence.” Dublin Review, 48, no. 96: (August 1860): 451–97.
        Discussing Denis Caulfield Heron’s book in detail and offers lengthy excerpts. The reviewer focuses a lot on the natural law content of the work. Publisher is J.W. Parker. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“History of England, from the Fall of Wolsey to the Death of Elizabeth (Vols 5-6).” Dublin Review, 49, no. 98: (February 1861): 263–300.
        Claims that these volumes are not as well done as the previous ones; the book is becoming a rather tedious narrative. The reviewer observes that Froude, like many contemporary historians, ignores the influence of the supernatural. Publisher is Parker, 1860.
Smith, Bernard.“The History of Herodotus, a New English Version, Edited with Copious Notes and Appendices, &c.” Dublin Review, 49, no. 98: (February 1861): 348–67.
        Offers a detailed discussion of the content of George Rawlinson’s translation; states that ancient history is once again in favour and this work specifically offers a style that makes for a good general reading book. Praises the quality of the translation. Publisher is John Murray, 1858-1860. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Ffoulkes, Edmund Salusbury.“Lectures on the History of the Eastern Church.” Dublin Review, 50, no. 99: (May 1861): 92–121.
        Discusses the content of Arthur Penrhyn Stanley’s book; compares it unfavourably to past works on the topic, provides extensive excerpts as evidence of problems. Publisher is John Murray. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Gilbert, John Thomas.“Lectures on the MS. Materials of Ancient Irish History.” Dublin Review, 50, no. 100: (August 1861): 475–98.
        Briefly discusses Eugene O’Curry’s past works and discusses the content in detail with excerpts; states that this book is interesting and useful. Publisher is James Duffy of Dublin and London. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“Collections on Irish Church History.” Dublin Review, 51, no. 102: (May 1862): 379–404.
        Examines the content of the Rev. Daniel McCarthy’s edition of materials concerning the 18th and 18th century history of the Irish church. Publisher is Warren, of Dublin, 1861. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Abraham, George Whitely.“History of Friederich II. of Prussia, Called Frederick the Great (Vol 3).” Dublin Review, 51, no. 102: (May 1862): 404–28.
        Discusses the content of Carlyle’s work with lengthy excerpts. Publisher is Chapman and Hall,. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“History of Federal Government.” Dublin Review, 52, no. 104: (April 1863): 579–80.
        States that Edward A. Freeman’s book is interesting, valuable, and instructive; expects that when it is complete is will offer a full account.
“The History of Girolamo Savonarola and of His Times.” Dublin Review, 1, no. 1: (July 1863): 232–38.
        States that Leonard Homier’s translation of Pasquale Villari’s book is written with a good acquaintance of Italian history, a lively style, and a clear head; described as well-researched, accurate, and overall satisfactory. Publisher is Longman.
“Lectures on the History of the Jewish Church (Part 1).” Dublin Review, 1, no. 2: (October 1863): 530–33.
        States that Arthur P. Stanley’s book contains colourful and fresh sketches but that these are not accompanied with answers to related questions. Also observes that Stanley lacks qualifications as a historian and that this work contains many deep errors that will later be addressed in a later review. Publisher is John Murray.
“History of the Holy Cross.” Dublin Review, 2, no. 4: (April 1864): 497–99.
        Discusses the existence of original copies of this facsimile of a 15th century work (first printed by J. Veldener), and reprinted copies that exist. Discusses the content of the book and notes that it is of antiquarian and religious interest. Text and engravings by J. P. Berjeau. Publisher is Stewart, 1863.
Russell, Charles William.“Froude’s History of England-Mary Stuart (Vols 1 & 2).” Dublin Review, 3, no. 5: (July 1864): 97–131.
        Examines Froude’s book in detail , stating that Froude is not a good historian, being recklessly contemptuous and virulent in his tone, and also arrogant. Publisher is Longman. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“Lectures on Some Subjects of Modern History and Biography.” Dublin Review, 3, no. 6: (October 1864): 497–98.
        J. B. Robertson’s lecture topics include the Restoration and Freemasonry; the history is assessed as worthy of the respected reputation of the author. Publisher is Kelly, of Dublin.
Jeffrey, Francis.“Surnames, in Relation to the History of Society.” Dublin Review, 3, no. 6: (October 1864): 344–71.
        Claims that this book by Robert Ferguson is interesting and full of information; it carefully proves its points. But although the author is well acquainted with his material, he ignores some essential topics (such as the Celts and their connection to Ireland). Publisher is Routledge and Co., 1858. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Russell, Charles William.“Theiner’s Materials of Irish History.” Dublin Review, 4, no. 8: (April 1865): 372–95.
        Discusses the content of this book edited by Augustus Theiner (Vetera Monumenta Hibernorum et Scotorum illstrantia, que ex Vaticani, Neapolis ae Florentice Tabulariis deprempsit et Ordine Chronologico disposuit). States that the sources provided offer little information on general history and that overall the book will be more useful as a supplement than a source of information in its own right. Book published 1864. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“Proposed Manual of English History.” Dublin Review, 5, no. 9: (July 1865): 173–85.
        Discusses the teaching of history and the usefulness and content of Lingard’s, Flanagan’s and other works for classroom use.
“The Claims of the Anglican Establishment to Be the Representative of the Primitive Church Tested by the History and Acts of the Council of Ephesus.” Dublin Review, 5, no. 9: (July 1865): 264–65.
        States that the content of this book by the Rev. T. Harper is full of subversive material and that the arguments are inconclusive. Publisher is Rockcliff, of Liverpool.
“A History of the City of Rome; Its Structures and Monuments, from Its Foundation to the End of the Middle Ages.” Dublin Review, 6, no. 11: (January 1866): 292–93.
        Claims that this book by Thomas Dyer is learned, elaborate, valuable, and the introduction is able and interesting. Also states that overall this work will be valuable to students of antiquities and contains the useful addition of well done maps, indices, notes, and references. Publisher is Longman.
“The Five Great Monarchies of the Ancient Eastern World; or, the History, Geography, and Antiquities of Chaldaea, Assyria, Babylon, Media, and Persia.” Dublin Review, 6, no. 11: (January 1866): 293–94.
        States that George Rawlinson’s book makes a dry and heavy topic attractive and interesting with his style and presentation.
“Lecky’s History of Rationalism.” Dublin Review, 7, no. 13: (July 1866): 51–79.
        Discusses the views and content of Lecky’s book and states that the author pays little attention to evidence or to arguments or lines of argument; characterizes the work as very one-sided. Publisher is Longman.
“The Massacre of S. Bartholomew, Preceded by a History of the Religious Wars in the Reign of Charles IX.” Dublin Review, 10, no. 20: (April 1868): 559–62.
        Briefly examines the content and views expressed in this book and states that it is accurate but that the author, Henry White is sometimes misled by his ‘anti-catholic prejudice.’ Publisher is John Murray.
“History of Philosophy from Thales to Comte.” Dublin Review, 11, no. 22: (October 1868): 556–58.
        States that George Henry’ Lewes’s book focuses on ancient and modern philosophy. The work shows great study and thought and will be useful to any student who is already well acquainted with the subject. Publisher is Longman.
“History of the Life and Times of Edward the Third.” Dublin Review, 12, no. 24: (April 1869): 506–10.
        Briefly examines the content of William Longman’s book and offers several excerpts. Remarks that this work is valuable and acquaints the reader well with the king; the best part of the work is its discussion of the effects of the Black Death and the institution of chivalry. Reviewer notes that Longman offers a very just and impartial portrait of this historic period and its king. Publisher is Longman.
“The New School History of England, from Early Writers and National Records.” Dublin Review, 14, no. 27: (January 1870): 289–91.
        States that, despite Protestant authorship, this book is fair to Catholics and truthful about Mary I and other controversial subjects; it treats political and historical facts and questions with care. However, states that the style is careless and that the brevity of his discussion of topics did not offer the full view that lengthier history works do. Publisher is James Parker and Co. Author also wrote The Annals of England (viz William Edward Flaherty).
“History of the Foundation of the Order of the Visitation; and the Lives of Mademoiselle de La Fayette, and Several Other Members of the Order.” Dublin Review, 16, no. 31: (January 1871): 243–45.
        Claims that this anonymous work is original and valuable and contains many useful and interesting biographical and historical facts. Publisher is Kelly, of Baltimore, 1870.
“History of the Restoration of the Catholic Hierarchy in England.” Dublin Review, 17, no. 33: (July 1871): 221–22.
        States that this book, by the Rev. Bishop Ullathorne, is the best on the subject to date; it is a valuable and important addition to ecclesiastical history, written in a lucid and nervous style. Publisher is Burns, Oates, and Co.
“Queen Elizabeth v. the Lord Chancellor, or a History of the Prayer-Book of the Church of England in Relation to the Purchas Judgment.” Dublin Review, 17, no. 33: (July 1871): 236.
        Brief discussion of the claims of this pamphlet by the Rev. W. Waterworth; judged to be worth reading for a history of the Protestant Church in England. Publisher is Burns, 1871.
“A Compendium of the History of the Catholic Church from the Commencement of the Christian Era to the Ecumenical Council of the Vatican, in Which Are Narrated Her Combats and Her Victories in Times of Persecution, Heresy, and Scandal, and Wherein Is Shown That Her Preservation Is a Divine Work.” Dublin Review, 17, no. 34: (October 1871): 491–94.
        States that Theodore Noethen’s book has a simple and natural style and is highly recommended. Publisher is Murphy and Co., of Baltimore.
“A History of the Christian Councils, from the Original Documents, to the Close of the Council of Nicaea, A.D. 325.” Dublin Review, 18, no. 36: (July 1872): 467–69.
        Focuses not on Charles Joseph Hefele’s original work, but rather on the new English translation by William R. Clark. States that the translation is fair and accurate but that the names of places and people are not always rendered properly and that the English is sometimes loose and slovenly. Publisher is T & T. Clark, 1871.
“Memoir of Count de Montalembert, Peer of France: A Chapter of Recent French History.” Dublin Review, 19, no. 38: (October 1872): 508–12.
        Author is Margaret Oliphant; review focuses on the content . Publisher is Blackwood.
Cruickshank, A. P. J.“The Middle Ages: Their Position in Church History.” Dublin Review, 19, no. 38: (October 1872): 294–335.
        Examines several works on various topics (philosophy, literature, church history) that all demonstrate the influence of the Church on the world. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Cruickshank, A. P. J.“Taine’s History of English Literature.” Dublin Review, 22, no. 43: (January 1874): 39–68.
        States that this work is, as the public and others claim, brilliant and original and deeply thoughtful but among other problems Taine is incapable of forming general judgement. Then goes on to offer a detailed account of the content of this translation by H. Van Laun, with excerpts. Publisher is Edmonston & Douglas, of Edinburgh, 1871. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“The Children’s Bible History.” Dublin Review, 24, no. 47: (January 1875): 247.
        Claims that this work is useful as a school book and a blessing for parents. Publisher is Burns & Oates, 1874.
Hope, Anne.“Ranke’s History of England.” Dublin Review, 26, no. 52: (April 1876): 332–50.
        States that this work is not without its flaws but that it is still valuable. Examines the content and Ranke’s beliefs. Publisher is Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1875. Hope also reviewed Ranke’s book alongside that of J. R. Green, in October 1875.  {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“Documents Concerning the History of the Church in England during the Times of Persecution.” Dublin Review, 27, no. 54: (October 1876): 543–44.
        Discusses the release of never before used documents concerning the Church in England and how they should be used and analyzed in forthcoming scholarship.
“A Popular History of the Catholic Church in the United States.” Dublin Review, 28, no. 55: (January 1877): 246–49.
        Discusses the content of this ‘voluminous narrative’ by John O’Kane and recommends it to readers. Publisher is  Sadler & Co., of New York.
“History of English Thought in the Eighteenth Century.” Dublin Review, 28, no. 56: (April 1877): 550–53.
        Discusses the methods and views of Leslie Stephen, and compares his style to that of Hume. States that overall Stephen is impartial and offers interesting information to readers there are exceptions to this level of quality, and style is also questionable in places. Publisher is Smith, Elder, & co, 1876.
Lilly, W. S.“The Study of Medieval History.” Dublin Review, 28, no. 56: (April 1877): 377–425.
        This article uses the publication of a German bibliography of medieval history (published Berlin, 1862) as the occasion for a lengthy study of the subject, commenting on the anti-Catholicism of several English historians, and also critiquing Roman Catholic approaches to the subject. Authors mentioned include Carlyle, Freeman, Hallam, Wordsworth and Scott. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“A History of the Councils of the Church, from the Original Documents (Vol 2).” Dublin Review, 29, no. 57: (July 1877): 237–40.
        States that this second volume stands up to the stellar reputation of the author, Charles Joseph Hefele. It is fair and impartial but does contain some typographical and translation errors but these do not interfere with the work’s value. Publisher is T & T. Clark, of Edinburgh, 1876.
“Legends of the Blessed Sacrament, Gathered from the History of the Church and the Lives of the Saints.” Dublin Review, 29, no. 57: (July 1877): 260.
        States that this book by Emily Mary Shapcote is well illustrated, offers well told stories, and will be useful and enjoyable in informing the youth. Publisher is Burns & Oates.
“A Compendium of the Philosophy of Ancient History.” Dublin Review, 30, no. 60: (April 1878): 518–19.
        States that although the Rev. Henry Formby’s book tends to put theory ahead of the facts, it will nevertheless attract attention to the Christian view of ancient history. Publishers are Burns and Oates, of London and The Catholic Publication House, of New York.
Lilly, W. S.“Archbishop Trench on Medieval Church History.” Dublin Review, 30, no. 60: (April 1878): 446–64.
        Discusses the content of Richard Chenevix Trench’s lectures, delivered at Queen’s College, London, in detail and offers many excerpts; states that Trench examines facts fairly and fully. Also compares this to past works on Medieval church history. Publisher is Macmillan. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“Epochs of Modern History.-The Age of Anne.” Dublin Review, 31, no. 62: (October 1878): 507–8.
        Claims that this book by E. E. Morris is clear, well-arranged, and fair. Book published 1877.
“The Constitutional History of England in Its Origin and Development.” Dublin Review, 31, no. 62: (October 1878): 508–11.
        Praises William Stubbs for being careful and exact; offers a brief discussion of the content and offers several excerpts. Publisher is the Clarendon Press, of Oxford,1873-1878.
“History of the Reformation, in Germany and Switzerland Chiefly (Vol 1).” Dublin Review, 32, no. 2: (April 1879): 552.
        States that this book by K. R. Hagenbach (trans. Evelina Moore) is written from an extreme evangelical standpoint; it is well translated but the author is guilty of extreme anti-Catholicism. Publisher is T&T. Clark, of Edinburgh, 1878.
“A History of Egypt under the Pharaohs.” Dublin Review, 33, no. 1: (July 1879): 252–54.
        The author is Henry Brugsch-Bey and the translator is Henry Danby Seymour. States that this work is valuable because it offers the scientific support of Egyptology to biblical history. Discusses its biblical content and its general interest content (including a notable section on women in Egypt). Publisher is John Murray.
“On the Origin of the ‘Solar Myth,’ and Its Bearing on the History of Ancient Thought.” Dublin Review, 33, no. 1: (July 1879): 90–111.
        Author of the book under review is Prof Vincenzi; title is Pre-Homeric Legends of the Voyage of the Argonauts.
“The Early History of the Christian Church during the First Ten Centuries.” Dublin Review, 33, no. 2: (October 1879): 503–4.
        States that Philip Smith’s book is accurate and provides what the reviewer would expect of a history of this sort; nevertheless readers looking for a true picture of the Church will not likely find it. Publisher is John Murray, 1878.
“A History of Classical Greek Literature.” Dublin Review, 35, no. 2: (October 1880): 476–78.
        Briefly discusses the content of J. P. Mahaffy’s book, which focuses on the poets and prose writers by offering a sketch of the authors and the works they created. Publisher is Longman.
“Church History of Ireland, from the Anglo-Norman Invasion to the Reformation.” Dublin Review, 35, no. 2: (October 1880): 513–14.
        This third edition of a book by Sylvester Malone is extensively edited. Stresses the relationship between Protestants and Catholics; states that it is valuable and permanent as it uses many original sources. Publisher is M. H. Gill & Son, of Dublin.
“Manual of Universal Church History (3 Vol).” Dublin Review, 5, no. 1: (January 1881): 213–15.
        Offers a very brief discussion of the content of John Alzog’s book (trans. E. J. Pabisch), mentioning a few regrettable defects. Publisher is M.H. Gill & Son, of Dublin, 1879.
“Outlines of the History of Religion to the Spread of the Universal Religion.” Dublin Review, 5, no. 1: (January 1881): 242–43.
        States that this book by C. P. Tiele (trans. J. Estlin Carpenter) is clear, candid, and deserving of praise, although it is radically unsound in places. Notes that the best part of this work is the bibliography. Publisher is Trubner, 1880.
“Young Ireland: A Fragment of Irish History.” Dublin Review, 5, no. 1: (January 1881): 226–29.
        States that Charles Gavin Duffy’s book has a clear and unaffected style and is overall well done. Offers a discussion of the content and several excerpts. Publisher is Cassell, Peter, Gilpin & Co., 1880.
“A Classical Dictionary of Hindu Mythology and Religion, Geography, History, and Literature.” Dublin Review, 5, no. 2: (April 1881): 483–84.
        Claims that this book by John Dowson is accurate and diligent but that its practical use is questionable; may be of best use to those who are preparing for missionary work in India. Publisher is Trubner & Co.
“The Intermediate Education History of England (Part 1).” Dublin Review, 6, no. 1: (July 1881): 275–76.
        Claims that Edmond Wren’s book, which contains condensed foreign and domestic, legislative and constitutional history, is formulated, well dated, and makes ample use of tables. However, it would have been better had it utilized a more Catholic perspective. Publisher is M. H. Gill and Sons, of Dublin.
“An Essay on the History of English Church Architecture Prior to the Separation of England from the Roman Obedience.” Dublin Review, 6, no. 2: (October 1881): 556–61.
        States that this book by George Gilbert Scott, which is a philosophical history of church architecture, is praiseworthy for literary and artistic merit. Discusses content and the author’s views, and offers excerpts. Publisher is Simpkin, Marshall, & Co.
“History of Ireland: Critical and Philosophical (Vol 1).” Dublin Review, 7, no. 1: (January 1882): 258–60.
        Discusses the content and views of Standish O’Grady’s book. Publishers are Sampson Low & Co., of London and Ponsonby & Co. , of Dublin, 1881.
Lilly, W. S.“History of Materialism, and Criticisms of Its Present Importance.” Dublin Review, 7, no. 1: (January 1882): 254–58.
        Author is Fredrick Albert Lange. States that the translation, by Ernest Chester Thomas, is elegant, careful, and accurate. Claims that the work itself states the case of materialism fully and offers well-done illustrations but omits crucial material and is one-sided. Publisher is Trubner. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
Lilly, W. S.“Introduction to the Study of English History.” Dublin Review, 7, no. 1: (January 1882): 250–54.
        Reviewer finds this book, by Samuel R. Gardiner & J. Bass Mullinger, disappointing. The theories it utilizes are questionable and the many omissions of facts and topics hinder its completeness. Publisher is C. Kegan Paul, 1881. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“Social History of the Races of Mankind.” Dublin Review, 7, no. 1: (January 1882): 264–65.
        Claims that this book does not bear the attributes that the author, A. Featherman, claims in his introduction. Publisher is Trubner, 1881.
“A Compendium of Italian History.” Dublin Review, 7, no. 2: (April 1882): 533–34.
        Claims that J. D. Morell’s translation of this book by Giovani Bosco is not satisfactory; the work itself is sequential and picturesque in itself, but overall is not recommended. Publisher is Longman, 1881.
“Introduction to the Study of Language: A Critical Survey of the History and Methods of Comparative Philology of the Indo-European Language.” Dublin Review, 7, no. 2: (April 1882): 525.
        States that this book by B. Delbruck is scholarly and well arranged; the opinions expressed within it are careful and well weighed. Publishers are Breitkopf and Hartel, of Leipzig, and Trubner, of London.
“The Granville History Readers. No. 2. History of England, from the Roman Period to the Wars of the Roses.” Dublin Review, 7, no. 2: (April 1882): 517–18.
        Discusses the content of this school reader (edited by Thomas T. Livesy) including the list of kings, genealogical tables, and the interesting and picturesque facts of events and people; states that this book makes learning history a pleasant and easy task. Also notes that the book is well illustrated and that the poems it contains are a good feature. Publisher is Burns & Oates.
“The History of the Religious House of Pluscardyn.” Dublin Review, 7, no. 2: (April 1882): 521–22.
        Claims that this book by S. R. Macphail is readable and pleasant. However it is uneven in the material it presents and the topics it addresses. Publisher is Oliphant, Anderson, Ferrier, of Edinburgh, 1881.
“Agnes Wilmott’s History and the Lessons It Taught.” Dublin Review, 8, no. 1: (July 1882): 262.
        Claims this book by Mary Agatha Pennell is a simple and pathetic Catholic story, which will be valuable to young readers. Publisher is R. Washbourne.
“History of England from the Wars of the Roses to the Present Time.” Dublin Review, 8, no. 1: (July 1882): 249–50.
        Claims that this book, presumably number 3 of The Granville History Readers edited by Thomas J. Livesey, is commendable, because it takes on the most difficult portion of the history, the reigns of Henry to Elizabeth, but it offers too much focus on mere incidents and names rather than information beneficial in a school reader of this sort. Publisher is Burns and Oates.
“History of the Egyptian Religion.” Dublin Review, 8, no. 2: (July 1882): 513–15.
        Notes this work dedicated to Babylonian-Assyrian religion and the religions of the Phoenicians and Israelites is concise, clear, and well translated. Also offers a brief discussion of the content.
“Manual of Universal Church History (Vol 4).” Dublin Review, 8, no. 1: (July 1882): 247–49.
        Author is the Rev. John Alzog (trans. Rev. F.J. Byrne). Review notes that this work makes excellent use of indices and tables and that the most interesting part is that about Pius IX. Publisher is M.H. Gill & Son, of Dublin.
“The Gallican Church and the Revolution: A Sequel to the History of the Church of France from the Concordat of Bologna to the Revolution.” Dublin Review, 8, no. 1: (July 1882): 244–47.
        States that this book by the Rev. W. Helney Jarvis has a clear and formidable style, is well-researched, interesting, and carefully written; overall this work is a valuable contribution to the subject. Publisher is Kegan Paul, Trench, & Co.
“A Bird’s Eye View of Irish History.” Dublin Review, 9, no. 1: (January 1883): 239.
        States that Sir Charles Gavan Duffy’s work is concise and brilliant but would have benefitted from a little less bias toward the English. Publisher is Duffy, of Dublin, 1882.
“A Guide to Modern English History (Parts 1 & 2).” Dublin Review, 9, no. 1: (January 1883): 249–51.
        Claims that William Cory’s book is a little too pretentious; offers a discussion of its content including lengthy excerpts to demonstrate this point. Publisher is Kegan Paul, Trench, and Co.
Bellesheim, Alfons.“Jesus of Nazareth; Embracing a Sketch of Jewish History to the Time of His Birth.” Dublin Review, 9, no. 1: (January 1883): 252–56.
        Discusses the content of Edward Clodd’s book, offering excerpts; questions its methods and judges the work to be unoriginal. Publisher is C. Kegan Paul and Co., 1880. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“A History of the Councils of the Church (Vol 3).” Dublin Review, 10, no. 1: (July 1883): 197–99.
        Focuses on discussing the content and ideas in Charles Joseph Hefele’s book. Publisher is .T & T. Clark, of Edinburgh.
“A History of the Papacy during the Period of the Reformation.” Dublin Review, 10, no. 1: (July 1883): 239–41.
        Claims that although Mandell Creighton’s book is admirable, succinct, and offers a complete account, it nevertheless contains several serious errors -- including its assumption of how the church was formed. Publisher is Longman., 1882.
“History of the World, for Schools and Colleges.” Dublin Review, 10, no. 1: (July 1883): 232.
        This very brief review states that this book by John MacCarthy contains all information a student might require; as well-written and accurate as can be expected under the circumstances. Publisher is the Catholic Publication Society, of New York, 1882.
“The History of England (New Edition).” Dublin Review, 10, no. 1: (July 1883): 192–93.
        Discusses the minor addition to the new volume of Lingard’s renowned and still excellent work. Publisher is Burns & Oates.
“The History of Mary Stewart.” Dublin Review, 10, no. 2: (October 1883): 489–93.
        Two books under review, an edition by Rev Joseph Stevenson of a contemporary manuscript (published Edinburgh: William Patterson, 1882) and a book by Colin Lindsay (published Burns & Oates, 1863). States that Stevenson’s claims are without question as his accuracy and sources are authoritative. Lindsay’s work is of less value but still praiseworthy.
“The History of the Catholic Archbishops of Tuam.” Dublin Review, 10, no. 2: (October 1883): 483–84.
        Notes that this book, by Oliver J. Burke, is succinct, interesting, and will have a wide readership but that it barely fulfils the promise of its title as many aspects are missing. Discusses the content very briefly. Publisher is Hodges, Figgis and Co., of Dublin, 1882.
“History of Burma: Including Burma Proper, Pegu, Taunsin, Tenasserim, and Arakan, from the Earliest Time to the End of the First War with British India.” Dublin Review, 12, no. 1: (July 1884): 235.
        States that this book by Arthur P. Phayre is an authority on the subject, contains valuable information, and a valuable appendix and maps. Publisher is Trubner.
“History of the Church.” Dublin Review, 12, no. 1: (July 1884): 213–14.
        States that this book by J. Chantrel (trans. E.F. Vibant.) contains many good points and should be used as a textbook; interesting, concise, and well arranged. Publisher is James Duffy and Sons, of Dublin, 1883.
“The History of Riots in London in the Year 1780, Commonly Called the Gordon Riots.” Dublin Review, 12, no. 2: (October 1884): 493.
        This very brief reviews notes that Alexius J. F. Mills’s book is vivid, graphic and very useful; hopes that it receives wide circulation. Publisher is Lane & Son, 1883.
Bellesheim, Alfons.“Historical and Biographical Sketches of the Principal Events and Characters in the Ecclesiastical History of the First Four Centuries.” Dublin Review, 13, no. 1: (January 1885): 226.
        States that this book, edited by John MacHale, is an epitome of the greater facts of the period; it has a good, concise, and clear style but is not a serious contribution to history -- more of an elegant memento. Publisher is M.H. Gill & Son, of Dublin, 1883. {attribution Wellesley Index}.
“History of the Church.” Dublin Review, 13, no. 2: (April 1885): 479.
        Author is J. A. Birkhaeuser. Review is a brief announcement. Publisher is Frederick Pustet, of New York, 1884.
“A Literary and Biographical History; Bibliographical Dictionary of the English Catholics (Vol 1).” Dublin Review, 14, no. 1: (July 1885): 239–40.
        Does not review Joseph Gillow’s compilation, but merely offers s very brief discussion of its content and purpose. Publishers are Burns & Oates, of London and Catholic Publication Society, of New York.
“History of the Catholic Church.” Dublin Review, 14, no. 2: (October 1885): 446–47.
        Discusses the new translation (by E. Pruente) of this book by Heinrich Brueck, written for use in seminaries and colleges. Review emphasizes the additions and special touches added by the translator. Publisher is Benziger Brothers, of New York.
“The Dictionary of English History.” Dublin Review, 15, no. 1: (January 1886): 222.
        Notes that the plan of this work, edited by Sidney J. Low and F. S. Pulling, is excellent and well carried out. It avoids bigotry, and the content is clear, accurate and full of merit. Also states that this reference work contains excellent tables. Publisher is Cassell & Co.
“A Literary and Biographical History; or, Bibliographical Dictionary of the English Catholics, from the Breach with Rome in 1534 to the Present Time (2 Vol).” Dublin Review, 15, no. 2: (April 1886): 445–47.
        Notes that Joseph Gillow’s book is impartial and well-written, but lacks comprehensiveness. Review offers a very brief discussion of the overall content. Publisher is Burns & Oates.
“A History of the Jewish People in the Time of Jesus Christ. 2 Vols.” Dublin Review, 16, no. 1: (July 1886): 223–24.
        States that this student book and reference work by Emil Schuerer (trans. Sophia Taylor and Peter Christie) is carefully compiled with original and secondary material, is well translated, and is overall very valuable. Also states the editors hope to be able to offer a review in greater depth at a later date. Publisher is T & F. Clark, of Edinburgh.
“Chapters in European History. 2 Vol.” Dublin Review, 16, no. 1: (July 1886): 176–81.
        Notes that William Samuel Lilly’s book focuses on Christianity, the Renaissance, and the French Revolution; judges it to be clear, eloquent, fresh, fascinating, brilliant, and profound. Publisher is Chapman & Hall.
“History of the Catholic Church (Vol 2).” Dublin Review, 16, no. 1: (July 1886): 227–29.
        Second volume of Heinrich Bruck’s work, translated by E. Pruente. Notes that this excellent work, which focuses on the time of Gregory VII to the present, is clearly arranged, interesting, and concise. Publisher is Benziger Brothers, of New York, 1885.
“History of St. Margaret’s Convent, Edinburgh.” Dublin Review, 17, no. 1: (January 1887): 214–16.
        Examines the background of the convent and discussing the content of this book by the Rev. William Smith, offering several lengthy excerpts. Publisher is John Chisholm, of Edinburgh.
“A History of the Jewish People in the Time of Jesus Christ. Vol 3.” Dublin Review, 17, no. 2: (April 1887): 471–72.
        Continuation of review of first two volumes briefly discusses the content of this book by Emil Schuerer (trans Sophia Taylor & the Rev. P Christie) and states that it is valuable and contains useful information (with the exception of author’s ignorance of the scholarship by Pusey on Daniel). Publisher is T. & T. Clark, of Edinburgh, 1886.
“History of England under Henry the Fourth (Vol 1).” Dublin Review, 17, no. 2: (April 1887): 445–46.
        States that this book by J. H. Wylie, which covers the period of 1399-1404 is instructive, interesting, and useful but exaggerates descriptions of some Irish events. Offers a brief discussion of the content. Publisher is Longman.
“Lectures on Mediaeval and Modern History.” Dublin Review, 17, no. 2: (April 1887): 472–75.
        States that William Stubbs’s lectures are interesting and instructive; offers a brief discussion and outline of the content. Publisher is Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1886.
“The Feudal History of the County of Derby (Vol 1).” Dublin Review, 17, no. 2: (April 1887): 459–60.
        Briefly discusses the content of John Pym Yeatman’s book and states that it is well organized. Publisher is Bemrose, 1886.
“The Legendary History of the Cross:” Dublin Review, 17, no. 2: (April 1887): 485–86.
        Book is a facsimile of a 15th century Dutch series of 64 woodcuts. Author of the introduction is John Ashton; preface by Sabine Baring-Gould. Publisher is T. Fisher Unwin.
“A History of England in the Eighteenth Century (Vol 5 & 6).” Dublin Review, 18, no. 1: (July 1887): 217–20.
        Focuses on the content of this work and states that W. E. H. Lecky’s judgement is calm and well balanced; he possesses the highest qualities of a historian. Publisher is Longman.
“History of the Catholic Church of Scotland. Vols 1 & 2.” Dublin Review, 19, no. 2: (April 1888): 458–61.
        Author is Alphons Bellesheim (trans. D. Oswald Hunter Blair). Reviewer notes that the first volume, which begins at the introduction of Christianity and covers the years 1296 to 1560, is well-researched and well translated but does not always offer original material and ideas, since they are based upon the theories and discoveries of Skene and other historians. Publisher is Blackwood, 1887.
“Chronological Tables, a Synchronistic Arrangement of the Events of Ancient History.” Dublin Review, 20, no. 2: (October 1888): 461.
        This compilation by the Rev. Arthur Jennings covers the history of politics, the Jewish church, military, biography, and topography and attempts to relate it to biblical history; reviewer finds the book poorly arranged but the tables will nevertheless prove useful to students. Publisher is Macmillan.
“History of the People of Israel till the Time of King David.” Dublin Review, 20, no. 2: (October 1888): 470–71.
        Satirical notice mentions that Ernst Renan’s work will destroy all faith in the Bible, but the translation is well done. Publisher is Chapman & Hall.
“Polybius. The History of the Achaean League.” Dublin Review, 20, no. 2: (October 1888): 459.
        This very brief review states that this book, edited by W. W. Capes and examining the author and his works is clear and interesting. Publisher is Macmillan.
“History of the Church, from Its First Establishment to Our Own Times.” Dublin Review, 21, no. 1: (January 1889): 222–23.
        States that this book by the Rev. J. A. Birkhaeuser is clear, readable, and offers a lot of information in a plain and simple style. Observes that it will prove a useful textbook in seminaries and colleges. Publisher is F. Pustet & Co.
“James’ Naval History; Epitomized in One Volume.” Dublin Review, 21, no. 1: (January 1889): 235.
        Robert O’Byrne has produced an abridged version of William James’s book, a narrative of sailors during the period of England’s greatest naval victories. It is characterized as enjoyable and a fine addition to any school library as well as ‘a capital present for boys going to sea.’ Publisher is Allen & Co., 1888.
“A History of the Seven Holy Founders of the Order of the Servants of Mary.” Dublin Review, 22, no. 2: (October 1889): 474.
        Notes that this book by Fr. Sostene M. Ledoux is readable, interesting, instructive, and well put together. Publisher is Burns & Oates. The review notes that the same publisher has produced an abridgement, by E. G. Swainson, under the title The Seven Servite Saints.
“The Feudal History of the County of Derby. Vol. 3.” Dublin Review, 22, no. 2: (October 1889): 484–85.
        States that this third section of the book by John Pym Yeatman, is valuable and well-researched.
“History of the Catholic Church in Scotland (Vol 3).” Dublin Review, 23, no. 1: (January 1890): 220–22.
        Reviews the third of 4 volumes of this history by Alphons Bellesheim, translated by D. Oswald Hunter Blair. Notes that the book covers the period 1560-1625; judges it to be clear, straightforward, methodical, well -researched, and elegantly translated. Publisher is Blackwood , 1889.
“The Persecutions of Annam: A History of Christianity in Cochin China and Tonking.” Dublin Review, 23, no. 1: (January 1890): 237.
        Review merely states that this is an ‘acceptable reprint’ of John R. Shortland’s book. Publisher is Burns & Oates, 1889.
“The History of Sligo: Town and County.” Dublin Review, 23, no. 2: (April 1890): 486–89.
        States that this book by T. O. O’Rorke is trustworthy and complete; it offers many interesting facts including archaeological points of interest. Offers a brief discussion of the content including excerpts. Publisher is James Duffy & Co., of Dublin, 1889.
“Loreto, the New Nazareth; or, the History of the Holy House.” Dublin Review, 24, no. 1: (July 1890): 229.
        Briefly discusses the content of this book by William Garratt, noting that it contains useful illustrations. Publisher is Burns & Oates.
“The History of the Sufferings of Eighteen Carthusians in England, Who Refusing to Take Part in Schism, and to Separate Themselves from the Unity of the Catholic Church, Were Cruelly Martyred.” Dublin Review, 24, no. 2: (October 1890): 492.
        States this translation of a narrative written in Latin by Maurice Chauncy is well-written and in the end is edifying and pathetic. Lacks illustrations. Publishers are Burns & Oates, of London and the Catholic Publication Society, of New York.
“A History of the Jewish People in the Time of Jesus Christ.” Dublin Review, 25, no. 1: (January 1891): 220.
        This seems to be a two-volume edition of the translation (by John Macpherson) of Emil Schuerer’s book. States that despite a few blemishes this is a valuable reference work and is overall a fine addition to the literature. Publisher is T & T Clark, of Edinburgh, 1890.
“Forgotten Heroines; or, History of a Convent in the Days of Luther.” Dublin Review, 25, no. 1: (January 1891): 229.
        Written by ‘the author of Tyborne’ (viz Frances Margaret Taylor) this book, focused on the Dominican Nuns of Strasburg, is regarded as deserving special attention. Publisher is Burns & Oates.
Scannell, T. B.“Elementary History of England.” Dublin Review, 25, no. 2: (April 1891): 488–89.
        Reviews Cyril Ransome’s Elementary History of England (published 1890 by Percival & Co.) and Catholic Child’s History of England by ‘E.M.’ (published 1890 in Dublin by Sullivan Brothers). Ransome’s is judged much the better of the two as it is accurate, interesting, and well printed, while E.M’s work is inaccurate, tedious, and ‘badly got up.’ Attribution Wellesley Index.
“Index to Schurer’s History of the Jewish People in the Time of Christ.” Dublin Review, 25, no. 2: (April 1891): 482.
        The book by Emil Schuerer, trans John Macpherson has been reviewed earlier; the publication of the index completes what is regarded as an admirable work. Publisher is T & T Clark, of Edinburgh.
“Manual of Church History (Vol 1).” Dublin Review, 25, no. 2: (April 1891): 459–60.
        Notes this book by the Rev. T. Gilmartin is an excellent textbook -- clear, orderly, and interesting. Also states that the author is very well acquainted with his subject. Publisher is M.H. Gill & Son, of Dublin, 1890.
“The History of St. Dominic, Founder of the Friars Preachers.” Dublin Review, 26, no. 1: (July 1891): 223–25.
        Offers a brief discussion and excerpts from this book by Augusta Theodosia Drane. Publisher is Longman.
“History of the Jews. Vols 1 & 2.” Dublin Review, 26, no. 2: (October 1891): 468–69.
        First two of five volume work by Heinrich Graetz, originally published in German (in 11 volumes); this edition by Bella Loewy. Discusses the content and notes that it is successful, popular, and much can be learned from it. Also states that it is a good reference book but is not pleasant reading. Publisher is David Nutt.
“History of the Jews. Vols 3-5.” Dublin Review, 0, no. 4: (October 1892): 473.
        This review of the remaining volumes of Heinrich Graeby’s history (edited by Bella Lowy) notes that the book is ‘not a history that will recommend itself to Catholics’. Criticized for tone, literary form and temper; also the translation “reads heavily.” Publisher is David Nutt.
“A Passage in the History of Charles I.” Dublin Review, 0, no. 6: (April 1893): 360–75.
        Discusses Belgian and European relations during the reign of Charles I (1625-1649).
“History of English.” Dublin Review, 113, no. 7: (July 1893): 693–94.
        States that A. C. Champrey’s book, on the history of the English language, is brightly written, clear, consecutive and well printed. Publisher is Percival & Co.
“History of St. Edmund’s College, Old Hall.” Dublin Review, 114, no. 9: (January 1894): 200–201.
        States that the Rev. Bernard Ward’s book is interesting and offers a very brief discussion of its content. Publisher is Kegan Paul & Co., 1893.
“History of the Church in England from the Beginning of the Christian Era to the Accession of Henry VIII.” Dublin Review, 114, no. 9: (January 1894): 192–93.
        States that this book by Mary H. Allies is a ‘storehouse of reliable information’, and recommends it as handy, well -researched, and addressing ‘all important matters’ in a smoothly-flowing narrative. Publisher is Burns & Oates. Another review, somewhat more positive, was published in the January 1893 Dublin Review and signed by J. B. Milburn.
“British History and Papal Claims from the Norman Conquest to the Present Day.” Dublin Review, 115, no. 11: (July 1894): 201–2.
        Notes that James Paton’s book is resolute, but biased; it has a ‘fierce’ style and is not of much linguistic merit. Publisher is Hodder & Stoughton, 1893.
“History of St. Philomena.” Dublin Review, 117, no. 13: (January 1895): 238.
        States this book, edited by Charles Henry Bowden, is an edifying narrative. It is intended for Catholics and may not be well received by others. Publisher is the Art & Book Co., 1894.
Kent, W. H.“A History of the Papacy during the Period of the Reformation (Vol 5).” Dublin Review, 116, no. 14: (April 1895): 438–42.
        Observes that Mandell Creighton’s book is a well done narrative; the most interesting part being an excellent appendix. However the reviewer complains of bias in the treatment of specific topics. Publisher is Longman, 1894. Attribution Wellesley Index.
“A Literary History of the English People.” Dublin Review, 117, no. 15: (July 1895): 210–13.
        States this book by J. J. Jusserand, which focuses on the connection between literature, the people and the nation, is broad, comprehensive, clear and full of information. Also briefly discusses the content. Publisher is T. Fisher Unwin.
“Primogeniture: A Short History of Its Development in Various Countries and Its Practical Effects.” Dublin Review, 117, no. 15: (July 1895): 190–91.
        States that this book by Evelyn Cecil is well-written, providing a succinct and lucid account of the principles of the law in the U.K, America, Asia, Turkey, Europe, and the British Colonies. Also notes that this work is valuable, interesting, extensive, accurate and written in an attractive and easy to follow style. Publisher is John Murray.
“The Jewish Race in Ancient and Roman History.” Dublin Review, 117, no. 15: (July 1895): 220–21.
        Author is Ambroise Rendu; this translation (by Theresa Crodhu) is based on the 11th revised edition. States that the book is useful but has a dry and jerky style; the reviewer criticizes the lack of biographical and bibliographical information, and the accuracy of the dates. Publisher is Burns & Oates.
“The First Two Centuries of Florentine History: The Republic and Parties at the Time of Dante.” Dublin Review, 117, no. 16: (October 1895): 470–74.
        Offers a brief discussion of the content of this book by Pasquale Villari (trans. Linde Villari); judges it to be well-researched, and offering new readings of history despite bias. Publisher is T. Fisher Unwin.
“Maynooth College: Its Centenary History.” Dublin Review, 118, no. 17: (January 1896): 129–45.
        Offers an indepth discussion of the content of this book by the Rev. John Healy. Publisher is Brown & Nolan, of Dublin, 1895.
“The Constitutional History and Constitution of the Church of England.” Dublin Review, 118, no. 18: (April 1896): 442–45.
        Book is by Felix Makower, a translation from the German. The review is overall quite positive, offering a Roman Catholic perspective on this Protestant account of a subject of both contemporary and historical interest. Publisher is Swan Sonnenschein & Co., 1895.
“A History of the Somerset Carthusians.” Dublin Review, 119, no. 19: (July 1896): 176–77.
        Discusses the content of this book by E. Margaret Thompson, stating that much of the material is not interesting enough to keep readers’ attention. Publisher is John Hodges, 1895.
“History of Ely Place.” Dublin Review, 119, no. 19: (July 1896): 237.
        Offers a very brief outline of this pamphlet by the Rev. J. A. Dewes. Publisher is Burns & Oates, 1895.
“Studies in Church History (Vol 2).” Dublin Review, 119, no. 19: (July 1896): 205–7.
        Claims this work by the Rev. Reuben Parsons to be scholarly, useful, written with a clear style, and with an admirable tone. Publisher is Pustet & Co., of New York, 1895.
Miley, John.“The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Vol. 1.” Dublin Review, 119, no. 20: (October 1896): 439–40.
        This review of the first of a planned 7-volume edition by J. B Bury characterizes Gibbon’s religious attitude as out-of-date. However the reviewer recognizes the usefulness of marginal dates, maps and illustrations. Publisher is Methuen & Co.
“The Veil Lifted: A New Light on the World’s History.” Dublin Review, 119, no. 20: (October 1896): 450–51.
        States that this book, in which H. Martyn Kennard claims to present some historical truth to the Bible, is ‘a nightmare or an opium-eater’s dream’ and offers several excerpts to support the claim. Publisher is Chapman & Hall, 1892.
“A History of the Protestant Reformation in England and Ireland.” Dublin Review, 120, no. 21: (January 1897): 209–10.
        Under review is Dom Aidan Gasquet’s edition (and revision) of William Cobbet’s book (written 1824-27). ‘This remains a valuable and accurate picture of the hideous tragedy of the Reformation, written in a manly and nervous style, in vigorous English . . .’. Cobbett is praised for following Lingard. Publisher is the Art and Book Co., 1896.
“Outlines of Church History.” Dublin Review, 120, no. 21: (January 1897): 224–25.
        States this book, ‘adapted’ from the German of Theodore Dreher (by Bonaventure Hammer) contains useful facts and is an easily read narrative; however it is referenced poorly, contains misprints, and is not as clear and concise as an outline should be. Publisher is B. Herder, of St Louis, 1896.
“The History of English Law before the Time of Edward I.” Dublin Review, 120, no. 21: (January 1897): 219–22.
        States this book by Sir F. Pollock is readable, well-researched, written in a pleasant style although the subject-matter is very dry. Also discusses the content briefly. Publisher is Cambridge University Press, 1895.
“The Two First Centuries of Florentine History: The Republic and Parties at the Time of Dante.” Dublin Review, 120, no. 21: (January 1897): 227–29.
        This book by Pasquale Villari is judged to be well-researched but its illustrations, although interesting, are not always appropriate. Publisher is Fisher Unwin.
“A Short History of the Catholic Church.” Dublin Review, 122, no. 26: (April 1898): 469–71.
        States that this book, F. Goulbourn Walpole, is as slovenly as they come and offers excerpts to prove this point. Regretfully cites another Catholic publication which thought well of it. Publisher is Burns & Oates.
“The Making of Abbotsford and Incidents in Scottish History.” Dublin Review, 122, no. 26: (April 1898): 462–63.
        States that Mrs Maxwell Scott offers a pleasant and easy style and the book is interesting. Offers a discussion of content. Publisher is Adam & Charles Black, 1897.
“The Secret History of the Oxford Movement.” Dublin Review, 122, no. 26: (April 1898): 476–80.
        Author is Walter Walsh; the reviewer regards the title as misleading, since the book does not address the Oxford Movement to a great extent, but rather focuses on the relations between the Roman Catholic and Anglican communions. Discusses the content and views expressed in the book. Publisher is Swan Sonnenschein & Co, 1897.
“Outlines of Jewish History from Abraham to Our Lord.” Dublin Review, 123, no. 27: (July 1898): 181–82.
        States that this book by Francis E. Gigot, while not very good, is nevertheless a step in the right direction; it will prove useful and valuable information for Catholics, who are described as lacking knowledge of biblical history. Publisher is Benziger Bros, of New York, 1897.
“History of the Irish Insurrection of 1798, Giving an Authentic Account of the Various Battles Fought between the Insurgents and the King’s Army, and a Genuine History of Transactions Preceding That Event.” Dublin Review, 123, no. 28: (October 1898): 466–67.
        Claims this book by Edward Hay is useful to understanding the topic, is of permanent value, impartial and unbiased. However it does not focus on the subject-matter covered in the title, but rather is confined to the war in Wexford. Publisher is James Duffy & Co., of Dublin.
“Studies in Church History (Vol 4).” Dublin Review, 123, no. 28: (October 1898): 415–16.
        The Rev Reuben Parsons’ book is described as useful and well-researched,, although it is a popular and not a scholarly history. but states that it is popular rather than scholastic in style. Publisher is Fr. Pustet & Co., of New York, 1897.
“The Early History of the Hebrews.” Dublin Review, 123, no. 28: (October 1898): 442–43.
        Discusses in detail the content of this book by A. H. Sayce, with excerpts. States that it is repetitive. Publisher is Rivington, 1897.
“The History of Our Own Times in South Africa. Vol. 2.” Dublin Review, 123, no. 28: (October 1898): 482–83.
        Alexander Wilmot’s book is described as both valuable and clear but the reviewer points out a few omissions. Publisher is J. C. Juta & Co., 1898.
“A History of Christianity in the Apostolic Age.” Dublin Review, 124, no. 30: (April 1899): 447–50.
        Author is A. C. McGriffert. Review discusses the content, noting that the book offers original and sound proofs. Publisher is T & T Clark, of Edinburgh, 1897.
“A History of European Thought in the Nineteenth Century (Vol 1).” Dublin Review, 124, no. 30: (April 1899): 457–61.
        Discusses the content of John Theodore’s book but declines to comment on its accuracy Publisher is Blackwood ,1896.
“History of Intellectual Development on the Lines of Modern Evolution (Vol 1).” Dublin Review, 124, no. 30: (April 1899): 464–67.
        States that although this book by John Beattie Crozier is well-researched, it makes assumptions, is one-sided and suppresses facts. Publisher is Longman, 1897.
“Cardiff Records: Being Materials for a History of the County Borough from the Earliest Times (Vol 1).” Dublin Review, 125, no. 32: (October 1899): 491–92.
        Reviewer commends J. Hobson Matthews’ edition.
“Studies in Scottish Ecclesiastical History in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.” Dublin Review, 125, no. 32: (October 1899): 460–62.
        Discusses the content and states that this book by M. G. J. Kinloch is bright, interesting, and crisply written. Publisher is Simpkin, Marshall, & Co., 1898.
“The History of St. Catherine of Siena and Her Companions (3rd Ed).” Dublin Review, 125, no. 32: (October 1899): 471–72.
        States that this excellent work by Augusta Theodosia Drane is succesful; carefully, minutely, and authentically compiled. Publisher is Longman, 1894.
“Short Catechism of Church History.” Dublin Review, 127, no. 35: (July 1900): 234–35.
        Author is J. B. Oechtering. Reviewer notes that the book is successful , providing important points briefly and neatly. Publisher is B. Herder, 1899.
“Studies in Church History.” Dublin Review, 128, no. 37: (January 1901): 205–6.
        The author is the Rev Reuben Parson; review observes that while the book is interesting, certain Catholic writers should have been treated with greater respect. Publisher is Fr. Pustet & Co., of New York, 1900.
“A Review of Irish History.” Dublin Review, 128, no. 38: (April 1901): 435.
        States that although this book by J. P. Gannon is not well-researched, its conclusions come together effectively. The reviewer compares it favourably to the usual dull, uninteresting, and heavy works on the subject as it is written clearly and agreeably. Publisher is T. Fisher Unwin, 1900.
“History of the Catholic Church in the Diocese of Springfield.” Dublin Review, 128, no. 38: (April 1901): 430–31.
        This book by the Rev. John McCoy is described as imposing, important, full of exhaustive information, and useful as a local history and biography. Publisher is Hurd and Everts Co., of Boston, 1900.
“The Holy Year of Jubilee: An Account of the History and Ceremonial of the Roman Jubilee.” Dublin Review, 128, no. 38: (April 1901): 417–21.
        Discusses the content of this book by Herbert Thurston, finding a few errors of detail but stating that overall it is handsome, quaintly illustrated, valuable, interesting, and opportune. Publisher is Sand & Co., 1900.
“History of Early Church Literature (Vol 1).” Dublin Review, 130, no. 42: (April 1902): 474–75.
        Otto Barden Van Hewer’s book covers the period until 200A.D; reviewer notes its difference from earlier works on the subject and its demonstration of a wide range of reading and extensive knowledge. Publisher is Herde, of Freigburg-im-Breisgau.
“A Catholic History of Our Country (Part 1).” Dublin Review, 131, no. 43: (July 1902): 229.
        The reviewer insists that this book, by Isabelle Kershaw, is useless; there are too many blunders even to point them out.
“The History of Mary I., Queen of England.” Dublin Review, 131, no. 43: (July 1902): 221–27.
        Discusses the content of this book by M. J. (Mary Jean) Stone, including excerpts; states that the work is remarkable, offers a vivid portrait, and overall is valuable and excellent. Publisher is Sands & Co., 1901.
“A General History of the Christian Era.” Dublin Review, 131, no. 44: (October 1902): 451.
        Reviewer observes that this work is useful, interesting, and clearly and neatly written.
“Dark Pages of English History.” Dublin Review, 132, no. 45: (January 1903): 185–86.
        States that this book by J. R. Willington fits in well with contemporary commentary on the Coronation; it is put together with care and accuracy but is nevertheless unclear in places and inclined to overstate the facts. Publisher is the Art and Book Company, 1902.
“The Coronation Ceremonial: Its True History and Meaning.” Dublin Review, 132, no. 45: (January 1903): 183–84.
        Herbert Thurston’s book focuses on the origin, history, general meaning, and preservation of the Coronation. States this work is clear and succinct. Publisher is the Catholic Truth Society, 1902.
“English History from Original Sources, 1399-1485.” Dublin Review, 132, no. 46: (April 1903): 443.
        Edited by G. T. Warner, this book is a compilation of extracts; as such, it is judged unsuitable as a textbook. However it is reliable and interesting, contains useful information and good illustrations. Publisher is A. and C. Black.
“Matriculation: Modern History.” Dublin Review, 132, no. 46: (April 1903): 429–30.
        Discusses the content of this book by C. S. Fearnside, noting that the author’s intentions have been successfully realized; it includes a full and excellent index, and is recommended to readers. Publisher is Clive, 1902.
“A History of the British Empire in the Nineteenth Century (Vol 1).” Dublin Review, 133, no. 47: (July 1903): 190–92.
        Observes that Marcus R. P. Dorman’s first volume covers only a few years (1793-1805) and is reasonably impartial but gives too much space to non-imperial matters and sometimes discusses the contemporary politics of empire. Publisher is Kegan Paul, Trubner, 1902.
“Granville History Readers (Books 2 &3).” Dublin Review, 133, no. 48: (October 1903): 440.
        Notes that these child readers are impartial and stick to the facts; this makes them a welcome addition to an under-serviced field of literature. Publisher is Burns & Oates.
“The Tutorial History of England.” Dublin Review, 133, no. 48: (October 1903): 402–3.
        Compares this book to C. S. Fearnside’s earlier work (Matriculation), stating and states this one is interesting, contains useful information as well as maps, tables, and plans. Publisher is Clive.
“A History of England for Catholic Schools.” Dublin Review, 134, no. 50: (April 1904): 435–36.
        Briefly discusses the content of this book by E. Wyatt-Davies, stating that it is clear, fresh, and idiomatic. Publisher is Longman, 1903.
“An Epoch in Irish History: Trinity College, Dublin (1591-1660).” Dublin Review, 134, no. 50: (April 1904): 438–40.
        States this book by J. P. Mahaffy also addresses Irish history in general, not only that of the university. Brief examination of the content; overall judgement that this is a fine contribution to knowledge of this great Irish university. Publisher is T. Fisher Unwin.
“Cambridge Modern History (Vol 3).” Dublin Review, 135, no. 51: (July 1904): 182–84.
        Discusses the content of A. W. Ward’ et al’s volume of the CMH, stating that it is pleasing, well-written, reliable, and generally excellent. Publisher is Cambridge: University Press.
“The History of Ampleforth Abbey.” Dublin Review, 135, no. 51: (July 1904): 213–16.
        Discusses the content of this book by Dom. Cuthbert Almond, stating that it is tastefully bound and contains excellent illustrations. Publishers are R & T. Washbourne of London and Benziger Brothers of New York, 1903.
“Unwritten History: An Episode of the Reign of Terror.” Dublin Review, 135, no. 51: (July 1904): 57–81.
        This signed article offers a detailed narrative of the situation leading to and surrounding the execution of many nuns at Orange (near Avignon) in 1794 as part of the French Revolution.
“St. Patrick in History.” Dublin Review, 135, no. 52: (October 1904): 410–11.
        Author is the Rev. Thos. J. Shahan; notes that the book is well done and a nice addition to the history of Ireland’s national saint. Publisher is Longman.
“A History of European Thought in the Nineteenth Century (Vol 2).” Dublin Review, 136, no. 53: (January 1905): 188–93.
        Discusses the content of this book by John Theodore Merz, offering excerpts and judging it to be enthusiastic, valuable, interesting, and important. Publisher is Blackwood, 1903.
“The Tutorial History of Greece.” Dublin Review, 137, no. 55: (July 1905): 211.
        States this handbook, by W. J. Woodhouse, will prove useful to students of Greek history. Despite not including a map of Greece it does make use of newly-discovered knowledge about ancient Greece. Publisher is W. B. Clive.
“Leading Events in the History of the Church (for Children). (Part 4).” Dublin Review, 0, no. 56: (October 1905): 436.
        Discusses the content of this book by a Sister of Notre-Dame. States that it is orderly, well-referenced , and helpful; the style is interesting and fluent. Publisher is the Christian Truth Society.
“Miss Stone’s The Church in English History.” Dublin Review, 141, no. 0: (July 1907): 426.
        States that this book by Mary Jean Stone is admirable, not dull, and omits little. Publisher is Sands & Co.
“Cambridge Modern History.” Dublin Review, 142, no. 0: (January 1908): 414–16.
        States that although this latest volume of the CMH is solid and useful, it is not brilliant as it offers nothing new. Publisher is Cambridge University Press.
“[No Title].” Dublin Review, 142, no. 0: (January 1908): 416–17.
        States that this novel, by M. Bazin -- about the history of five nuns -- offers a quaint, gentle simplicity but that the elegant style of the work is lost in the English translation.
“Duchesne’s Ancient History of the Church. (Vols 1 & 2).” Dublin Review, 144, no. 0: (January 1909): 132–43.
        Notes that L. Duchesne’s Histoire Ancienne de L’Eglise consists mostly of opinionated conclusions and that not all will agree with its statements. Also states that the style is easy, idiomatic, and delightful, and overall it is well arranged and cautious. The reviewer comments that the author is not always serious. Publisher is A. Fontemoing, of Paris, 1906/1907.
“The History of the Popes from the Close of the Middle Ages (Vols 7 & 8).” Dublin Review, 144, no. 0: (January 1909): 189–94.
        Offers a discussion of the content of this book by Pastor Ludwig, translated by Ralph Francis Kerr. Publisher is Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co.
“Bede’s Ecclesiastical History.” Dublin Review, 145, no. 0: (July 1909): 430–33.
        States this translation is authentic, well sourced, and contains useful maps and notes. Publisher is George Bell and Sons, 1907.
“History of the English Labourer.” Dublin Review, 145, no. 0: (July 1909): 448–50.
        States this book by Wilhelm Hasbach is apt, full of quotations, orderly, accurate, and well translated. Publisher is P. S. King and Son, 1908.
“Early Church History.” Dublin Review, 147, no. 0: (July 1910): 401–4.
        These lectures, by Bishop Hescott, are judged to be pleasant, but to offer nothing new.